Comparison

Updated October 26, 2026

· ~1 min read

A FHIR Server on AWS: HealthLake vs HAPI FHIR vs Medplum

FHIR
AWS HealthLake
HAPI FHIR
Medplum
Healthcare

FHIR is now the required interface for payer APIs under CMS-0057-F and the common language of EHR integration. All three options store and serve FHIR R4 resources. They differ in who operates them, how far you can change them, and what comes built in around the server.

Side by side

AWS HealthLake

HAPI FHIR

Medplum

Who runs it

AWS

You

Medplum (hosted) or you (self-hosted)

Pricing

$0.27 per data store hour (10 GB included), $0.37 per GB-month beyond, queries beyond 3,500 an hour at $0.048 per 10,000

Open source; you pay for compute and database

Free tier; Production from $2,000 a month; Premium from $6,000; self-hosting open source

HIPAA

HIPAA-eligible under the AWS BAA

Your responsibility on HIPAA-eligible infrastructure

Hosted plans per Medplum's terms; self-hosted is your responsibility

Built in

SMART on FHIR, bulk export to S3, medical NLP, FHIR subscriptions

Validation, terminology, many FHIR operations

Auth, bots (server-side automation), React components, integrations

Customization

Within the service's API

Anything: it is Java you deploy

High: open source plus extension points

Which one

Question 1 of 2

Is FHIR mainly an API and data store you must provide, such as CMS-0057-F payer APIs?

Our verdict

**AWS HealthLake:** the least to operate, under your AWS BAA, with SMART on FHIR, bulk export and medical NLP built in. Fits payers and analytics teams that want FHIR as a managed data store. Less room to customize server behaviour. **HAPI FHIR:** the most control and no licence cost: the reference open-source server, run on ECS or EKS with Aurora PostgreSQL. Fits teams with Java skills that need custom operations or validation. You own upgrades, scaling and security. **Medplum:** a developer platform around FHIR (auth, bots, a React component library, integrations) for teams building clinical applications. Open source, hosted or self-hosted. Adds the most application tooling; hosted plans cost the most at small scale.

Related solutions

CMS-0057-F Payer APIs on AWS

Medicare Advantage, Medicaid, CHIP and federal-exchange QHP payers need Patient Access, Provider Access, Payer-to-Payer and Prior Authorization APIs by January 1, 2027. We build them on AWS with HealthLake or a FHIR server, map your claims and clinical data to the required profiles, and wire prior authorization to your UM system.

8–16 weeks
$40k–$150k
View

HIPAA-Ready AWS Environment

Implement the AWS controls required for HIPAA compliance, before the auditor asks.

3–6 weeks
$20k–$45k
View

Get your FHIR APIs designed and built on AWS

We work with startups and growing companies on AWS architecture decisions. Tell us about your situation and we will recommend the right approach.

As of October 26, 2026. Provided as is, for general information, and accurate to the best of our knowledge on the date shown. Not legal, compliance, tax, financial or other professional advice. Prices, limits and vendor services change; check current vendor documentation before relying on anything here. Terms of use.