Comparison

Updated October 25, 2026

· ~2 min read

Oracle on AWS in 2026: RDS for Oracle vs EC2 vs Oracle Database@AWS vs Moving to PostgreSQL

Oracle
Oracle Database@AWS
Amazon RDS
Aurora PostgreSQL
Licensing

For years, Oracle customers on AWS chose between RDS for Oracle, running Oracle themselves on EC2, or leaving Oracle for PostgreSQL. Exadata and RAC workloads usually stayed on-premises because neither AWS option offered them.

Oracle Database@AWS, generally available since July 2025 and in twelve AWS Regions by April 2026, runs Oracle Exadata Database Service and Autonomous Database on Exadata hardware inside AWS data centers. That removes the main reason the largest Oracle databases could not move.

Side by side

Oracle Database@AWS

RDS for Oracle

Oracle on EC2

Aurora PostgreSQL

Runs on

Exadata infrastructure in AWS data centers, operated by Oracle

AWS-managed instances

Your EC2 instances

Aurora

RAC and Exadata features

Yes

No

No RAC support on standard EC2

Not applicable

Licensing

License included or bring your own

License Included for SE2; BYOL for Enterprise Edition

BYOL; two vCPUs count as one processor licence with hyperthreading

None

Who operates it

Oracle, with AWS integration

AWS

You

AWS

Migration effort

Low: Oracle to Oracle

Low to medium

Low to medium

High: schema and PL/SQL conversion

Converting to PostgreSQL

AWS DMS Schema Conversion converts schemas and much of the PL/SQL automatically, with generative AI assistance for the code it cannot convert by rule. The remaining work is in Oracle-specific features (packages with complex state, autonomous transactions, hierarchical queries written the Oracle way) and in performance testing, because the optimizers behave differently. The case for conversion is the licence and support bill every year after. The case against is a large, stable database with years of PL/SQL that nobody wants to touch. For that, Oracle Database@AWS or RDS for Oracle is the honest answer.

Which one

Question 1 of 2

Does the workload use RAC or Exadata today?

Our verdict

**Oracle Database@AWS:** Exadata or RAC workloads, and databases too large or too dependent on Oracle features to convert. Oracle manages the database; it sits next to your AWS applications. **RDS for Oracle:** most single-instance Oracle databases. Managed backups, patching and Multi-AZ; License Included for Standard Edition Two, BYOL for Enterprise. **Oracle on EC2:** configurations RDS does not support, at the cost of running it yourself and careful licence counting. **Aurora PostgreSQL:** applications where the Oracle licence is the problem and the PL/SQL is manageable. The largest long-term saving, and the most work.

Related solutions

AWS Architecture Review

A focused, senior-level review of your current AWS architecture, with a prioritized list of what to fix and why.

1 week
$4k–$8k
View

AWS Cost Optimization & FinOps Sprint

Reduce your AWS bill by 20–60% while improving performance and reliability.

1–3 weeks
$6k–$18k
View

Get your Oracle estate assessed

We work with startups and growing companies on AWS architecture decisions. Tell us about your situation and we will recommend the right approach.

As of October 25, 2026. Provided as is, for general information, and accurate to the best of our knowledge on the date shown. Not legal, compliance, tax, financial or other professional advice. Prices, limits and vendor services change; check current vendor documentation before relying on anything here. Terms of use.