AI makes producing articles nearly free, which is why the web is filling with confident, outdated, wrong ones. The pipeline behind this site: primary sources first, claims checked before drafting, dates on everything, a human who knows the subject, and analytics to tell whether it helped anyone.
Language models write fluently about anything, including things that changed last month and things that were never true. A pipeline that goes straight from prompt to publish produces articles that read well and cite model versions retired a year ago, prices that moved, and features that do not exist. Readers who know the subject notice in a paragraph, and that reader is exactly the one a consulting site is for.
Book a free 30-minute call. You'll leave knowing what we'd do first and roughly what it costs, whether or not you hire us.
Start from a question a client asked or a date on a calendar — a deprecation, a release, a price change — not from a keyword.
Collect primary sources first: the vendor's documentation, model cards, release calendars, pricing pages and security advisories. Secondary articles are leads, never sources.
Extract the facts — dates, versions, prices, limits — with the source next to each, before any prose is written.
Draft from the facts, with the opinions marked as ours.
Check every number and date in the draft against its source again. Anything that cannot be traced is cut or softened.
A person who does this work for a living reads it as a skeptical client would.
Publish with the date, prerendered so search engines and AI assistants can read it, and measure: which posts start visits, and which visits end in a conversation.
Reading a hundred pages of release notes and lifecycle tables quickly and pulling out what changed.
Turning a set of verified facts into a clear structure — tables, decision trees, checklists.
Finding what is stale: comparing what an old article claims against what the documentation says today.
Keeping consistency across dozens of pages — names, dates and terminology that agree.
Once a month: what changed in tech that month and what it means for you, from cloud and AI to security and the tools you build with. Every item links to its source. No sales pitch, unsubscribe in one click.
Book a free 30-minute call about it. Bring your setup and your bill; you'll leave knowing what we'd do first and roughly what it costs, whether or not you hire us.
Or keep reading
Measuring Search and AI-Assistant Traffic in 2026: What You Can Know and What You Can't
ChatGPT, Perplexity, Claude and Gemini now send real visitors, and crawl your pages to answer questions without sending anyone. What your own analytics can see, what only Search Console and server logs can, why our own articles were invisible to AI crawlers until we fixed it, and a measurement setup that covers all three.
Read
Ad-Hoc Questions on DynamoDB vs Postgres: 16 Analytics Queries at 100,000, 1 Million and 5 Million Orders
Every question across customers is a full table scan in DynamoDB: 217,000 read units at 5 million orders, whether it returns 10 rows or all of them. Postgres answered the same 16 questions in 0.08 to 2.7 seconds without a single index added for them, and an index built in 2.7 seconds took one from 148 ms to 44 ms. Measured in AWS.
Read
As of October 25, 2026. Provided as is, for general information, and accurate to the best of our knowledge on the date shown. Not legal, compliance, tax, financial or other professional advice. Prices, limits and vendor services change; check current vendor documentation before relying on anything here. Terms of use.